Some friends and I have been playing poker a couple of times a month for the last year or so. Our play is terrible, no one cares, and we usually spend more on beer than we win. It's a good time.
In November a few of us decided to head to the local card club and try our hands at play in the wild. We decided to enter a tournament. Tournaments are a great way to start out playing at a card club because you know going in exactly how much money you're going to loose from the start. Ninety or so people each pay a fixed entrance free, and only the top nine of them get any prize money at all. Tournaments all offer good initial chip parity -- everyone starts with exactly the same amount of money so you can't be pushed around by bigger stack from the start. Another added bonus is that for your initial buy-in of twenty or so dollars you get a few thousand "dollars" in tournament chips. They're not real money but they're the closest I'll ever come to saying, "I raise 2000," without having to append, "pennies."
The tournament was great fun and though none of us made it into the top 50% of finishers we really liked the betting structure. The tournament was divided into twenty minute rounds each of which had their own amounts for the blinds (like antes) and minimum bets. The constantly escalating financial pressure encouraged aggressive play and ensured a timely conclusion.
Last night the friends were coming by for poker again and wanted to play tournament-style, but we couldn't find any tournament round display software for download. I ended up writing a quick and dirty one poker timer that allows for the display of progressive round values. I would have liked to have displayed it through the TV but lacked the right cables so we just set a laptop where everyone could see it. I've attached the Java source, binaries, and a screenshot.
Last November while sitting in the Atlanta airport with not much to do I saw a bank of six different trash cans. They were in a neat row, each was in a different color, and they were all good for only one thing. People would walk up with a piece of trash and then carefully place it into whichever bin it best fit. Is this bottle glass or plastic? The lid is aluminum does it need to come off? Is this a number two plastic or a number four plastic?
People, actual grown adults, were sorting garbage. If thirty years ago you had tried to tell me that in the next millennium everyone sorts garbage, you'd have failed because I wouldn't have been born yet. But had I been born I suspect I wouldn't have believed you.
Then in my boredom I had a vision, Shrimp Recycling. I wanted nothing more that to watch the people scanning the array of recycle bins to come across one with a logo indicating that shrimp tails and only shrimp tails were to be tossed into it. Would these automatons even notice or would they just pass it over as not-the-aluminum bin? Would they store away the knowledge and start saving their shrimp tails for future recycling? How the hell would you recycle a shrimp tail?
I knew then I needed to make up some shrimp recycling logos I could affix to existing recycling bins in public places. Today I finally got around to it and, well, it's pretty clear I'm not graphic designer. Still, I hope to make them into vinyl labels and see what happens.
Attached is a small copy of the graphic and an archive containing the layered gimp file and an image sized for printing at 8" x 8" at 300 DPI. If I ever get around to actually making the labels and trying 'em out I'll try and post photos.
Of course shrimp tails would be an excellent addition to any compost heap. There may be other compostable matter in the airport, but who cares.
I got email from a few different folks saying that compost rather than recycling would be a better end for shrimp shells. I would have assumed so myself too, but then some googling turned up some pages saying that seafood shells aren't good for compost as they decompose too slowly. Some sites recommended grinding them into a fine powder and using them in mulch to reduce acidity.
Still, I'm mostly interested in how people would respond to shrimp recycling bins. I suspect the majority would pass them by without surprise. Maybe I'll place one in the row of trash cans next to the Lodge at the lakes this year and stake it out.
I live in a sleep deprived state. Not just because I have a lot to do and resent sleep as the short-term death it is, but also because I enjoy the swirling colors. Maintaining a sleep deprived state requires a good alarm clock. When your brain knows it needs 8 hours and you're giving it 4 it's gonna fight you, and given that it's in charge of your perceived reality, it doesn't have to fight fairly.
Buying a good alarm clock is an exercise in frustration. The features advertised on the box are seldom relevant, and the most important ones are never mentioned. In the absence of a plugged in display model one is left to read the labels on the buttons or if available a manual to try to see how the thing actually works. Two features which cannot be omitted without ruining the clock are:
The first of those two is the most important and has only really been available since microprocessors driven solid state buttons became cheaper than sliding switches. Unfortunately I've never seen a clock box explain whether or not turning off the alarm leaves it ready for the next days horrible awakening. Sure, this means that sometimes the alarm goes off on Saturday because I forgot to turn it off for the weekend and that my neighbors hate me when I go out of town, but until I see a clock that knows weekends from weekdays default-on is better than manual-select.
The snooze button to power button ratio is nearly as important. After my eighth snooze my brain is loudly explaining to my arm that everything would be much better if it would just "accidentally" hit the power button instead. The arm must not be allowed plausible deniablity.
Three years back I finally found a great alarm clock. The RCA RP3711 http://www.epinions.com/content_54115470980 meets the two must-have requirements. It also offers:
It's a great clock and I intend to pick up a few as back-ups in the future. Unfortunately, the power-off button is just a little too easy to hit. It's not at all easy to confuse for the snooze button (it's a teal circle up top as compared to a large silver dome on the front), but it can be hit from above with a ham-fisted swat which is just a bit too easy. For years I've corrected this by taping a small circle of plastic over-top the power button. When I was finally willing to actually get up and turn off the clock I'd flip up the cover and then press the button -- sort of like firing missiles in a fighter jet.
However, with things as busy as they've been at work lately I'm running on even less sleep than normal and Brain has been tricking Arm more reliably. A few times as of late I've woken up hours after I should have and Brain is all, "Arm must have done it," and Arm is all, "Nope, Torso was laying on me."
To fix this I decided to take apart the clock and see what could be done about making the power button harder to press. I was envisioning adding another push button in series with the existing one necessitating the pressing both at the same time to shut it off. If these two buttons were on opposites sides of the clock and more than a hand span apart actually waking up when turning the clock off would be almost assured. If a length of cable with two wires in it was used the power button could even be removed from the clock altogether and placed over by the door -- now that's safety.
Unfortunately the little micro-switch was a surface mount component and getting it loose was going to take better soldering skills than I have. I had to settle for snipping off the plastic caps for the volume control and power switch. Now to turn the clock off one must carefully place a finger deep into the gaping hole on the top of the clock and depress the tiny micro-switch. Indelicate button pressing results in a miss and likely an electric shock -- that'll teach Arm to listen to Brain.
When I was 10 years old, I picked up a Sony "Dream Machine" (ICF-C370). Not only does the alarm stay set, it requires pressing two buttons to turn it off. Not in succession, either, you have to press them both in the proper order - first the 'Alarm' button, and while holding that down, the 'Alarm on/off' button. I've been using this alarm for 15 years and it's performed flawlessly. Although I'm extremely happy with it, I find myself requiring more, as of late. See, I'm not some gimp that requires the use of the snooze button. My problem is that the snooze button is so large that I accidentally hit while fumbling to turn the alarm off. Then, while I'm happily showering or something, it starts going off. I need a way of reducing the size of the snooze button, or disabling it entirely. Also, my clock makes annoying clicking noises if I set my phone to close to it... I'm sad that the alarm clock market sucks so bad now... I really want to find a good one -- Gabe Turner
GPSDrive (http://www.gpsdrive.de/) is nifty software for Linux that turns a laptop and a cheap GPS receiver into a vehicle navigation system. It displays maps, records tracks, logs speed traps, and all the other little features you'd expect in a system trying to divert your eyes from the road.
It also sports a built-in system for networking with other GPSDrive enabled systems on the road to mutually plot one another's locations. The system, called friendsd, uses a simple UDP server to record and report the position, speed, and heading of other reporting systems on the same server. Of course, this reporting only works if the laptop has access to the Internet but with the various cellular and wi-fi systems available that's not so much a stretch.
I've got a silly little project in the works for using friendsd in a manner other than its original intent, but I needed to be able to interact with it using something other than GPSDrive as the client. To that end I wrote up a little Perl module, Net::Friends (attached), that provides for basic reporting to and querying from friendsd servers. I think it game out pretty well.
...or your own silly Condo board. For the second time I've run for and been shot down running for the association board for my condominium development.
The board determines the budget, handles rules infractions, and controls the contract with our management company. The current board, though well meaning, has made a lot of choices I haven't understood and they haven't felt it necessary to explain.
The first time I ran, two years ago, I ran offering a "do nothing" board. I wanted the board to do as little as possible with as little as possible and feared things wouldn't go that way without my involvement. I didn't make the board then and we have had a very... hands on board.
Now two years later, with a large portion of the condo residents unhappy with the board's spending, medaling, and secrecy I ran a campaign promising a more transparent board. I got the majority of the vote of those present at the meeting, but couldn't out number the proxies.
You see rather than have absentee ballots for the 80% of the residents that didn't attend the meeting the board mailed to each of them a form, the signing of which would proxy their voting power to the existing board. So even though most of the people at the meeting voted for me the 32 proxy votes that were cast against me in advance outweighed them. Knowing about the proxy system from prior sham elections I'd created a proxy form that assigned votes to me and had distributed them as best I could without the postal resources the board had. That yielded 16 votes but even those couldn't overcome the 32 votes the board had been given.
Fortunately, there will be another election in just one short year and two of the five seats will be up for grabs. In the meantime I'll be continuing to help maintain http://riverstation.org/ for the visibility and working to get the proxy system replaced with absentee ballots and prior nominations.
To think, all this work just to get on a board and block actions.
Interesting story, Ry4an.
I think your platform this year is a winning message and you should continue on it next year. To win next time, organize, organize, organize.
I just attended Camp Wellstone <http://www.wellstone.org>, where I learned the basics of organizing a campaign. You might find it useful to attend their candidate track next time they have a program. When I did it, it was about $50.
Here's some of what I learned there, as it applies to your situation [aside: as I wrote this, I realized this could be pretty fun. I'll be your campaign manager if you want...].
The campaign plan is your blueprint for the campaign: how you get to 50% + 1 votes. This will include the size of the voter universe, how many votes you need to win, and what you're willing to spend to do it (budget). You'll also define your message here (accountability and transparency).
Every campaign comes down to lists: supporters, opponents' supporters, donors, volunteers.
Make a list of your core supporters. Add to it those who voted for you last time either by proxy or in person. Also keep track of those who opposed you and the proxy votes they control.
Using your list of supporters, contact them during the year long before the election to let them know you're going to run again, for accountablity and transparency. Line up their support as the basis for your "grassroots" campaign. Get them to assign their votes to you in proxy, and talk their neighbors into doing so as well. This is where you can economically start giving people proxy forms. If you consolidate your base and enlist some of them as volunteers, you can probably have a few of them run off copies to give to neighbors as well.
After you consolidate your base, you need to expand it. RiverStation.org is good for this purpose, as are volunteers you can drum up. You're already regularly attending community meetings, so that is a good place to get support as well. Bring a few copies of literature and proxy vote forms to these meetings to give to people.
Remember to keep track of the people you're contacting in your database.
A few weeks before the vote, start going after potential voters you don't have a personal relationship with. Go door knocking and talk to people. Likely, the will be upset about something the Board is doing. Let them know you're going to fight to make the board more accountable to the residents. This is where literature and proxy form dropping come in.
From your Campaign Plan, you know how many votes you need to win; from your database, you know how many you have. Now, make up the difference.
Starting a few days before the vote, call the people on your list of supporters to see if they're going to the vote meeting. If not, get a proxy form from them (send a volunteer to collect it so you can keep calling).
-- Luke Francl
'd totally take you up on help with this November's election. When writing for and especially speaking for campaign related stuff I have a hard time walking the line between soudning committed and sounding goofy.
I still thing the biggest help would be to get the election rules switched to something more fair, but there's the same problem as with respect to getting IRV in the USA -- the currently controlling parties have no reason to support any change in the way controlling parties are selected.
I'd be happy to come over sometime and plot strategy. You should hash out your list of supporters and opponents and how many votes they control before you forget too much.
Regarding changing the voting system, the only way you're going to do that is by getting a majority of the board to agree to it. That means you might need to elect more people to the board than just yourself, unless you can win over the current board with your rhetorical charms.
So why not surprise the board by winning under their rigged system?
-- Luke Francl
Yeah, that sounds fun. Within the condo association everyone's largely anonymous -- I don't know the names of any residents that aren't on the board or weren't previously known to me. Unfortunately, I didn't even think to write down the names of the sixteen people who did proxy their votes to me. It may be that if I provide the copies I could get the board to include me as one of the people to whom votes can be proxied on the form they mail out. Currently that list includes each of the current board members and a management company representative.
The riverstation.org site gathers email addresses and I've got the ability to send out a mass email through that channel which'll hit 50 to 100 of the units. As for making lists the board is launching an official website on March 1st which should provide a roster with names addresses and (maybe) email and phone contact info for everyone in the complex. Also, I suspect a request to the board might result in permission to actually get into each building to slip a flyer/proxy-form under doors instead of having to lurk in the cold to get in.
I think you're right about the (un)likelihood of success for a changing the way votes are done strategy. I've got the big book of condo rules, but I haven't yet checked to see how precisely the policy is spelled out in there and what (if any) policies are in place for modifying the rules themselves.
For the last five or so years I've been trying to imagine what it would have been like growing up with easy computing, and I don't think it would have been good for me. Back in 1988 when I first started seriously playing with computers they were hard to use. You had to learn a lot of obscure text commands, and most everything you tried to do required that you know how something worked that could reasonably have been abstracted away from you.
Because of that level of difficulty I think I turned out to be a much stronger computer user, programmer, and general hacker. I now delve into difficult computer problems confident in the knowledge that with enough effort I'll figure out what I need to understand to make things work. I'm now quite choosy about which "ease of use" features I'll let hide ugly detail from me, and which ones I'll skip to instead reveal the underlying system.
The problem is, I was forced to climb the steep learning curve of the command line interface and other "old school" hallmarks. I don't know if I would have done it if I could have dragged myfile.txt onto a picture of printer instead of typing COPY MYFILE.TXT > LPT1
I then start to worry about the young teenagers I know who have grown up in a graphical user interface world. I don't see them embracing difficult computing and the accompanying power and flexibility. Who can blame them. It's a pain in the ass for the first few months/years and teenagers aren't always known for the determination, foresight, and patience.
In an attempt to create an inviting way to draw teens into advanced computing I've started a project called The Young Hacker's Interactive Primer (with apologies to Neal Stephenson). As I see it the two things necessary to get a kid interested in exploring difficult computing were (1) a safe place to do it and (2) inducement to further exploration.
To provide a safe place in which to explore a UNIX system, I decided the easiest was to do it was to just give them one. There are plenty of alternatives such as dual booting their existing systems, run-from-CD UNIXes, and just giving them remote shell accounts. I figured actual physical systems were the best solution because there's no risk of them trashing their parents or their real computer, they can have root when they're ready, and because everyone likes getting a gift -- even when it's a Pentium 233.
The inducement comes in the form of little puzzles and tasks of increasing difficulty. Initially you just need to log in with provided user name and password. Then you work on viewing the contents of a file. Then changing a directory. Each task can build on the previous ones while requiring one new fundamental skill be learned, ideally from man pages and documentation. In envision it as something like one of the old infocom text games except taking place right in the UNIX shell.
Who knows, maybe my attempts to make learning difficult computing will still be too boring, frustrating, and un-glamorous to draw a kid through the 10 different layers of abstraction that Apple and Microsoft want them the use unquestioningly. Worst case I get a few old computers out of my closet.
The fledgling project can be found at https://ry4an.org/primer/ There's still not much to see, but I expect to change that shortly as I've already told a kid I know that I hope to give him a computer shortly after thanksgiving.
For the last three years Cari, Bridget, Joe and I have co-hosted a Halloween party at Cari's and my place. Every year I man the bar because I enjoy doing so and like the chance to talk to everyone periodically over the course of the night. This year I decided to turn the role into my costume and dressed as Moe Szyslak, the bartender from The Simpsons.
In one particularly good third season episode, titled "Flaming Moe" (http://www.snpp.com/episodes/8F08.html), Moe finds great success serving a drink whose recipe was stolen from Homer. The drink, which Moe calls the Flaming Moe, includes as its secret ingredient Krusty Brand non-narkotik cough syrup and erupts into quickly retreating pillar of flame when lit. I figured if I was gonna do Moe I had to make that drink.
I started with the drink base and after many failed attempts to make that was (1) classy, (2) tasty, and (3) grape, I gave up on the first two and just went with grape kool-aid, grape pucker schnapps, and triple sec. It was palatable. After pouring that base in from a pitcher I'd then add just a little "cough syrup" (grape sugar syrup) from a re-labeled nyQuil bottle.
For the column of fire effect I'd place the drink in front of a tea light I had sitting on the bar, and would then use a salt shaker to sprinkle from above a cascade of non-dairy creamer onto the candle. When I got the concentration just right (too much and you extinguish the candle, too little and nothing happens) the non-dairy creamer would flare up in a foot tall fireball which looked for all the world like it was coming out of the glass. Unfortunately it only worked about one in ten times.
Below is a photo of the tail-end of one of the flare ups, and the illusion isn't bad. Thanks to Jan Creaser for the photo. Also attached is a small image of the label and an archive containing a full-size version printable at 300dpi for bottle modification.
Three days ago I posted a rather lengthy entry wherein I decried the current state of open, collaborative calendaring. In it I listed six requirements for calendaring software and settled on the option available to me that met the most of them. Now I'm changing my mind.
At the time I needed a new calendaring solution fast and had checked out all the candidates before. The software package Remind had a nice interface, an expressive configuration language, web-visibility, local-storage, and was open source. It met four of the six requirements and would have served admirably for a few years. So why did I find myself laying awake worrying about my choice? (Seriously, I'm that big of a loser.)
The cause of my mis-selection was part haste and part willful self-deception. I wanted to go with Remind because I knew working with it on a day to day basis would be a joy. Toward that end I manipulated the selection criteria to favor Remind. The six requirements I listed are valid, but using a bullet list rather than a sorted list presents them as being all of equal import, which just isn't the case.
In The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint Edward Tufte addresses bullet points saying, "For the naive, bullet lists may create the appearance of hard-headed organized thought. But in the reality of day-to-day practice, the [PowerPoint] cognitive style is faux-analytical." He then goes on to explain how PowerPoint caused the Columbia space shuttle disaster.
Sorting my list of six requirements by importance (most important first) yields:
Even that doesn't show the relative weight given to each requirement. A representation displaying importance would show that the first one, standard data format, is probably more important than all the rest put together.
As mentioned previously the Remind file format is great to work with, but no other software uses it. What's more as one became more proficient with remind one's event entries would get more complicated, making eventual migration all the harder. I'm not willing to ghettoize my data, so Remind has to go.
When limiting myself to the current calendaring data standards (vCal, iCal, and xCal) the list of options shrunk dramatically. There were no text-only options and the web-based options were all painful. I looked into Ximian's evolution (http://www.ximian.com/products/evolution/) but it was slow and insisted on storing data in ~/evolution. I ended up deciding to run Mozilla Calendar (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/). It's nice enough, actively developed, has good standards compliance, and runs inside the only non-text application I always have open, my web browser.
Anyway, getting my phpGroupWare data into Mozilla Calendar just meant writing another conversion script. This one, phpGroupWare to iCal, (attached) might at least be useful to someone other than me.
This whole process undoubtedly seems silly, but at its core is a firm rule for data longevity: store your data in open, standard, lowest-common-denominator formats. Ask any company with 10,000 word processor documents that can no longer be read using their new software. Closed data formats are manacles that can be a hassle over the course of decades scale and tragic on a historical time scale.
I'm happy with my email client, text editor, compilers, IRC client, news reader, web browser, and just about every other tool I use in the process of my daily computing. The only consistent source of displeasure has been my calendaring (when the hell did that become a word?) application. I have a hideously over-scheduled life and need some sort of scheduling solution be it computerized or otherwise to keep things straight, but I've never found anything that really suits me needs.
Over the last 10 years I've used and discarded a number of solutions, including a paper notebook, palm pilot, gnomecal, and phpGroupWare. Each of them has had their advantages and their drawbacks, but none of them has been perfect. Wherein 'perfect' meets these requirements:
To my knowledge nothing out there yet handles all of these requirements. Likely nothing ever will, but so long as they use a standard interface to a data back end I'll be able to mix-and-match sufficiently to reach calendaring nirvana.
There are, however, many applications that do an excellent job with some of the requirements. Apple's iCal (whose horrible name creates confusion by overlapping that of an established data standard) uses the standard iCal data format and WEB-DAV for good groupware-ness, but they've locked down the groupware functionality to their .mac boondoggle and aren't sufficiently free. phpGroupWare doesn't use standard data formats and is pretty krufty in general. Sked (http://sked.sourceforge.net/) has a great interface but uses non-standard data storage and doesn't seem to be actively developed any longer. Reefknot (http://reefknot.sourceforge.net/) was a promising iCal groupware back end until it was apparently abandoned.
On the horizon is Chandler from the OSAF (http://www.osafoundation.org/) which is promising a good, decentralized-groupware, standard-data-format back end that would allow for text, GUI, and web clients. I'm trying not to get my hopes up because if 10 years of looking for a decent calendaring solution has taught me anything it's that they'll shoot themselves in the foot somehow.
For the time being I'm moving to remind (http://www.roaringpenguin.com/remind/). It's free, text mode, offers web viewing, and stores my data locally. It doesn't offer any sort of groupware capabilities, and perhaps worse yet has a completely non-standard data format. Moving my existing data (exported from phpGroupWare) into remind's human-editable format required just a few simple conversion scripts (attached), but moving back out of remind's powerful storage format to something more standard (again likely vCal) will be a real nightmare.
If anything I'd say my decision to switch to the hard-to-migrate-from remind application shows my pessimism that anything sufficiently better to be worth switching to will be available within the next two or three years.
Being a telecommuter, the closest thing I have to an office is an IRC channel. IRC (Internet Relay Chat) is like a chat room minus the emoticons and pedophiles. While normally the office IRC channel is the very embodiment of maturity, there are two silly things about it that have always annoyed me. The first being that everyone gets to pick their own name, and the second being they can change their names at will.
When everyone can pick their own name you end up with a lot of all-lowercase, powerful sounding names for people you think of as Jim and Bob. If everyone has their own terminal on which they're viewing the channel's discourse there's no reason why we can't all see each other referenced by whatever name we're most comfortable calling the person.
Worse yet is the ability for everyone to change their names. Occasionally, and I've no idea what triggers it, everyone will start switching names willy-nilly to new and sometimes each other's names. This is like going to a costume party where everyone keeps switching masks every few minutes -- eventually someone's gonna kiss someone else's girlfriend.
Because I'm cantankerous and have too much time on my hands, I wrote I little script for the excellent Irssi IRC client I use ( http://irssi.org/ ) that mitigates the hassle from both of the bits of silliness mentioned above. Using my script I can issue commands of the form "/call theirnick whatIcallThem" and from then all messages from the person who was using the nickname "theirnick" will now show up as from "whatIcallThem", and it will do so regardless of how many times they change their nickname.
Is it perfect? No. The people in the channel still refer to one another by their nicknames so I still have to decode nick -> human mappings in my head, but at least not so frequently. At any rate, the script is attached. It is known to work with Irssi v0.8.6.
This script has been updated in a recent entry.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Generic License.
©Ry4an Brase | Powered by: blohg 0.10.1+/68e111c5bd42